|

ARC
Info
ARC
Listserv
Adirondacks
Annual
Conference
AJES
Contact
ARC
Research
Links
|
The
Adirondacks
New
York State was the breeding ground for the American industrial revolution.
The timber resources of the Northeast United States, extensive waterway
system providing transport to mid-western states, and the birth
of the 20th century's financial center of New York City, all contributed
to the accumulation of wealth and power characteristic of the Empire
State. New York has been home to the Rockefellers, Vanderbilts,
and other oil, rail, and industrial empires that became synonymous
with a turn-of-the-century free-market ideology perhaps never before
and never since experienced. This chapter of New York history is
well known and continues to shape the discourse within boardrooms
of Fortune 500 companies, the New York Federal Reserve, and the
trading floors of Wall Street and the New York Stock Exchange.
A lesser-known
chapter of New York history stands in contrast to the well-known
culture of human expansion, exploitation and domination. New York
State is also home to the largest park in the contiguous United
States. The century-old, six-million-acre Adirondack Park of Upstate
New York is larger than its better know cousins Yellowstone, Yosemite,
Grand Canyon, and Smoky Mountain National Parks combined. In fact,
the American concept of wilderness and land conservation can be
traced to the constitutionally protected New York Forest Preserve,
upon which the Adirondack Park was built. Created in 1892 through
an amendment to the State Constitution, the New York Forest Preserve
in the Adirondack and Catskill Mountains today stands as one of
the strongest protections of land in the world (Brown, 1985; Terrie,
1994). Article XIV of the New York State Constitution reads in part:
The lands of
the State . . . shall be forever kept as wild forest lands. They
shall not be leased, sold, or exchanged, nor shall the timber thereon
be sold, removed or destroyed.
Throughout the
20th century, the development and lumbering restrictions set forth
by Article XIV withstood many challenges from timber interests and
hydropower projects, and more recently, large scale tourism development
interests (Schaeffer, 1994). Any change to the N.Y. Constitution
requires the passage of amendments in consecutive State legislatures
followed by a statewide public referendum. This rather rigorous
process has made it possible for Article XIV to stand against such
challenges. In fact, the significance of Article XIV has extended
well beyond the Park's boundaries. It is widely recognized that
its language, and decades of legal experience in its defense, laid
the foundation for the U.S. National Wilderness Act of 1964.
Yet despite
its strength, the New York Forest Preserve faces similar challenges
to those faced by many national and international nature protection
efforts. Like most conservation strategies, the Forest Preserve
depends in large part on State government purchases (or seizures)
of land and on the cessation of economic activity within protected
land boundaries. Such strategies have proven effective at best for
small parcels of land. However, government finances and the availability
of land for sale typically limit them.
The Adirondack
Park is no exception. Its boundaries were originally drawn with
the ultimate goal of total State acquisition. However, through the
years, as the Park boundary expanded, land values increased, Adirondack
towns and villages developed, and large tracts of land were retained
in the private sector, it became clear that this ultimate goal was
infeasible. The Adirondack Forest Preserve did continue to expand,
but today accounts for just under half of the six-million-acre Adirondack
Park.
While the level
of protection afforded to the public Adirondacks is unique, the
incorporation of private lands within a protected Park system sets
the Adirondacks apart from the typical public park model. By including
both public and private lands within the Park boundaries, comprehensive
planning had to evolve in order to protect a large relatively intact
ecosystem from incompatible uses on privately owned land.
Prior to the
1970s, public land in the Adirondacks was simply protected with
no intent of incorporating recreational land use on protected lands
into the Parks land use regulations. Yet given the Park's
unique structure of private lands intermingled with publicly owned
tracks of land, new forms of land use and protection were needed.
Private lands consist of small tracts around hamlets, large open
spaces owned by timber industries, a few remaining wealthy estates,
and recreation clubs.
Following the
completion of interstate highway 87 in 1967, which runs through
the eastern border of the Park connecting large population centers
in New York City and Montreal, new threats to the Park's ecological
integrity emerged. Public lands were suddenly accessible to a larger
and demographically and economically more diverse segment of the
Northeast U.S. population. New subdivisions and sales of private
lands for second-home and seasonal housing development, town expansions,
and recreational land use development rapidly altered the character
of the private land pockets within the Park. In reaction, New York
State commissioned a study of the Adirondacks resulting in the creation
of the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) in 1971. The APA was charged
with the task of zoning the public Adirondacks for recreational
use and the private Adirondacks for various intensities of development.
The results of the newly formed APAs work were two comprehensive
plans: the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan (1972) and the
Adirondack Park Private Use and Development Plan (1973). Table 1
lists the public and private zoning classifications, current percentage
of Adirondack land within each, and a brief description of use intensity
by zone.
At the dawn
of the 21st century, the story of the Adirondack Park is one of
seeking to live the generally abstract concept of sustainability
rather than conservation. People are trying to make a living within
a protected area rather than keeping human use and nature protection
neatly separated. Today's Adirondack Park is home to over 135,000
permanent residents in 105 towns and villages, and host to over
200,000 seasonal homes. Seventy million people live within a days
drive from the Park. Almost by accident, the region has evolved
into an application of modern multiple land-use models extolled
by conservation biologists to protect large ecosystems through networks
of cores, corridors, and buffers (Erickson, 1997). McKibben (1995),
Schneider (1997), Terrie (1997) and others have looked at the Adirondack
experience in search of compromise between economic development
and environmental protection. In the search for operationalizing
vague principles of sustainable development, the Adirondack story
is shedding some much needed light on the its application at a regional
level.
References:
Erickson, J.D.
(1998). 'Sustainable development and the Adirondack experience',
Adirondack Journal of Environmental Studies, 5(2).
McKibben, B.
(1995). Hope, Human and Wild: true stories of living lightly on
the earth. Little, Brown, and Co., Boston, Massachusetts.
Schaeffer, P.
(1989). Defending the Wilderness: the Adirondack Writings of Paul
Schaefer. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.
Schneider, P.
(1997). The Adirondacks: A History of America's First Wilderness.
Henry Hold and Co., Inc., New York, N.Y.
Terrie, P.G.
(1994). Forever Wild: A Cultural History of Wilderness in the Adirondacks.
Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York.
Terrie, P.G.
(1997). Contested Terrain: A New History of Nature and People in
the Adirondacks. The Adirondack Museum/Syracuse University Press,
Syracuse, New York.
|